(no subject)
Sep. 10th, 2004 11:58 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
kingandyWindscreen repair kit did not have a great deal of effect. Will have to take a ruler to it, see if it is under the 10mm crack limit. May ring windscreen people to see how much it would cost to replace the whole damn thing.
A few weeks ago I noticed that I tend to try to get the last word in a conversation; when disengaging, there's usually a certain amount of back and forth ("See you then, then - So long - b'bye"), and I'd been going to some length to claim the last farewell. If somebody says something, I just have to respond to it, and that's something I've been doing in LJ as well. So I've been trying to do it less, both LJ and RL. It is quite difficult. I just thought I'd mention, in case people think I haven't been very polite lately. Since that is why I do it, after all - I instinctively consider it quite rude not to acknowledge somebody's communication. Or something.
I am sure great psychological studies have been made on the subject of conversational behaviour such as this. I am unaware of any of their conclusions.
A few weeks ago I noticed that I tend to try to get the last word in a conversation; when disengaging, there's usually a certain amount of back and forth ("See you then, then - So long - b'bye"), and I'd been going to some length to claim the last farewell. If somebody says something, I just have to respond to it, and that's something I've been doing in LJ as well. So I've been trying to do it less, both LJ and RL. It is quite difficult. I just thought I'd mention, in case people think I haven't been very polite lately. Since that is why I do it, after all - I instinctively consider it quite rude not to acknowledge somebody's communication. Or something.
I am sure great psychological studies have been made on the subject of conversational behaviour such as this. I am unaware of any of their conclusions.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2004-09-10 09:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-09-10 09:49 am (UTC)2) Cute.
3) Blonde (this is on a sliding scale with Cute, the cuter the girl, the less blonde she has to be. Due to be phased out 2005.)
4) Pants cover her shoes.
5) Boobs!
6) ...[access denied]
no subject
Date: 2004-09-10 09:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-09-10 10:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-09-10 10:07 am (UTC)Now get packing!
no subject
Date: 2004-09-10 10:13 am (UTC)ITYM Trousers
Otherwise I am scared by your favoured underwear
no subject
Date: 2004-09-10 10:52 am (UTC)