Hmmm. Has the person in question met anyone else in the immediate social group and, more to the point, is said person perhaps looking for a new bunch of friends? You need to provide more information before the pollsters can make an informed division.
May be not be a stalker just a party monster. Some people are always willing to travel to go to what looks like a good party and also they may wish to expand their social circle and a party is a good way to do it.
You're not supposed to listen to me, what if I'm wrong? What if hypothetical makes the bunny boiler look normal? Ahhhhhh the sense of responsibility is too much. *conscience meltdown*
Its just that in a bizare mirror, grendelchild did the reverse a couple of years ago.
It's perfectly harmless, and should be allowed with no worry or mockery, despite the fact that I voted for stalker. I'm allowd to be contadictory I tfeel.
They might like parties. Or want to meet all the lovely Manchester people. Or have a free weekend and want to escape the boredom. I've visited friends in London a couple of times just because I felt like a weekend away and it gave me an excuse to waste all my money in Camden - did this to Ed's house when I didn't know them very well, and I've dropped in on the Sunderland chaps a coupel of times now - getting to know people is just another reason to visit. Glasgow to Manchester is quite a nice drive - it's an easy route, and there's some beautiful scenery and nice places to stop on the way through the Lake District.
Having said all that, I did vote for stalker. After all, bacony has the highest stalker-magnetism of any woman I know. Not that that should have affected my answer, what with it being an entirely hypothetical question
I wondered where Weeble was. Oh, and not a stalker. Pit may have been outside my flat with a pair of binoculars and night visions a few months ago, but he wasn't stalking anyone. Much.
no subject
Date: 2004-08-09 05:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-08-09 05:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-08-09 05:09 am (UTC)Um... I would say Stalker. Captital S.
no subject
Date: 2004-08-09 05:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-08-09 05:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-08-09 05:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-08-09 05:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-08-09 05:43 am (UTC)Its just that in a bizare mirror,
It's perfectly harmless, and should be allowed with no worry or mockery, despite the fact that I voted for stalker. I'm allowd to be contadictory I tfeel.
no subject
Date: 2004-08-09 05:54 am (UTC)She would have gone up to his place for housewarming too, had funds allowed. She does not see that this only encourages them.
no subject
Date: 2004-08-09 06:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-08-09 06:14 am (UTC)Surely Stockholm syndrome is only applicable if you’re a hostage.
Date: 2004-08-09 06:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-08-09 08:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-08-11 03:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-08-11 03:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-08-09 06:33 am (UTC)And I've met you more than twice (not that we've talked).
And I don't live in Glasgow.
Or am I missing the point?
no subject
Date: 2004-08-09 06:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-08-09 06:45 am (UTC)Plus I'm likely to have a party so I'm hoping you'll be in Birmingham not Manchester then.
no subject
Date: 2004-08-09 06:58 am (UTC)Three years after?
a) Did I tell you that, or did you find it out through stalker ways?
b) Doesn't that make you ... old?
no subject
Date: 2004-08-09 07:05 am (UTC)No, I'm not old. I am older. It's relative. Neither of us is
If you came to Birmingham so I could stalk you, this simply makes me a more efficient stalker.
no subject
Date: 2004-08-09 10:04 am (UTC)I am not old. I am distinguised, wise and a little bit mysterious.
no subject
Date: 2004-08-09 10:14 am (UTC)And you can't have it both ways.
Plus, isn't it a good way for you to get in on this thread - keeps you involved and all that ;-)
And no, I don't want to get any older. So if you can help with that let me know.
no subject
Date: 2004-08-09 10:43 am (UTC)And I think you'll find there's no anatomical reason whatsoever that I can't have it both ways.
no subject
Date: 2004-08-09 07:57 am (UTC)Having said all that, I did vote for stalker. After all,
no subject
Date: 2004-08-09 08:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-08-09 08:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-08-09 08:39 am (UTC)It wasn't me
Date: 2004-08-09 08:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-08-09 01:10 pm (UTC)Nonetheless, I have dispatched the Ninja Hit Squad.
no subject
Date: 2004-08-09 01:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-08-10 01:54 pm (UTC)Not neccesarily.