(no subject)
Nov. 7th, 2008 11:22 amI was definitely going off the idea of the Razr2. Yes, it's beautiful, yes it remains a lust object but logically - the main reasons I go for clamshell phones are a) the main screen is protected on the inside so you can put it in your pocket, and b) the keys are on the inside so you don't have to lock them. The Razr2 has a big-ass screen on the outside and touch-sensitive keys so it kind of defeats the object. Also the two big screens apparently drain the battery much more quickly than the singular screen of a slide phone. (I initially looked down on the slidy phones as a bit gimmicky but when you've got clamshells with a screen on the outside as big as on the inside, the slide design becomes a lot more sensible.)
Plus, of course, there are the standard disclaimers that the Motorola O/S is just not as good as its contemporaries. I can live with that, but I am aware that there are better ones out there.
However ...
... they're now less than £100 and I have a birthday coming up.
teeeeempting. The preciousssss.
Alternatively...
Plus, of course, there are the standard disclaimers that the Motorola O/S is just not as good as its contemporaries. I can live with that, but I am aware that there are better ones out there.
However ...
... they're now less than £100 and I have a birthday coming up.
teeeeempting. The preciousssss.
Alternatively...
no subject
Date: 2008-11-07 01:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-07 01:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-07 02:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-07 05:50 pm (UTC)Motorolas in general, from what I have seen, tend to have low memory and low battery life compared to other phones. Unless they have managed to overcome these two fairly critical problems by now...