TeeVee! We Talk TeeVee!
Apr. 23rd, 2007 10:03 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
kingandyOh, a few quick notes re this week's Doctor Who ...
Still, it was all good fun and I quite liked the musical number. Loved those wings...
[1] Or "Using human cellular matter and protein chains as raw material from which to grow new Daleks"
- Part of me hopes they will take this opportunity to tie all the Dalek survival into one big lump. Currently there are three distinct instances of Daleks surviving the Great Distaster From Which No Dalek Could Possibly Have Escaped, which is somewhat stretching the bounds of credibility. From 1930s New York, it would be quite easy for (a) one gold Dalek to end up, broken and confused, in Van Statten's museum in 2012, and (b) the others to escape, hide in subspace, decide one of them is the Emperor and start converting humans into Daleks[1] to build up their empire (in their Long Game). I half-suspected the human-to-Dalek conversion process was what the Great Experiment was going to be ... it's still not out of the question for Dalek Sec to become the Emperor, he does have that big throbbing brain after all.
- I still don't see the advantage of leaving behind your impervious flying battle-suit with built-in ray-guns, even if you do get "imagination".
- Why wasn't it called "The Daleks Take Manhatten!"?
Still, it was all good fun and I quite liked the musical number. Loved those wings...
[1] Or "Using human cellular matter and protein chains as raw material from which to grow new Daleks"
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2007-04-23 09:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-23 09:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-23 09:41 am (UTC)Seriously though I believe your theory has merit although I do not think they'll spell it out. They're a tendancy for slight nods rather than blantancy. As to this seasons suprise guest. I really hope the Daleks and them are unrelated.
no subject
Date: 2007-04-23 09:59 am (UTC)If there is a connection, it'd better be a damn good one.
Wait, weren't they the ones who executed him that one time?
no subject
Date: 2007-04-23 10:03 am (UTC)And yes, they did. But I'm not sure why. Up until then they'd only shared screen time cannon once.