TV stuffs

[kingandy]

I've now watched this week's Doctor Who (Father's Day) - it's an excellent story, as long as you don't get hung up on the temporal mechanics.

I've been looking forward to Paul Cornell's episode since I heard he was on the list, so I saw the ending from a reasonable way off.  Cornell is an unapologetically soppy writer (which comes through in elements such as Mr Tyler instinctively trusting his future daughter, giving her his car keys without a moment's thought) and doesn't much care for letting the underlying science get in the way of a thumping good story.  And a thumping good story it is too, with very real and human emotions flying back and forth.  I have not a word of complaint on the subject of dialogue and character, it was all good.

As to the mechanics of it though.  Oh, where to begin.  I don't think it's possible to do a really thorough analysis of the whole shebang at this time of night, and anyway to do so would be to miss the point.  (My main problem is that I don't see why people would forget the preceding events when Pete died.  I have issue that changing history would cause monsters to appear and eat people, but the Doctor did mention that their double presence had complicated things, so I will allow it.)

Despite the somewhat confused nature of the whole timeline thing - and it is the sort of thing my Mum would pick apart and frown at, as we used to do with Quantum Leap - Cornell has somewhat artfully skirted the issue.  No time is wasted on clumsy technobabble exposition, spelling out exactly what happened and why; instead of making excuses, the dialogue simply lays out the way things are, demonstrating what has changed through flashbacks to Rose's youth.  Fans can argue the exact whys and wherefores until the cows come home, and I'm sure they will.

For stsquad's reference: The Chronovores I mentioned were from The Time Monster.  They have been featured in Cornell's Who work before; previously they've appeared in humanoid form.  If this is a reappearance they've certainly undergone some cosmetic changes, or at least stopped bothering to pretend, but they're certainly "time eaters that would swallow a life as quickly as a boa constrictor can swallow a rabbit."  Again, I'm sure there are fans out there already speculating.

And, lo!  There are.


We (stsquad and myself) also watched the penultimate Enterprise episode.  Between the heartfelt wouldn't-it-be-nice-if-everyone-was-nice speech at the end, and the scene where further drama only occurred because the starfleet personnell suddenly forgot they were holding magic space guns that can instantly and harmlessly render somebody unconscious (leading to a tense standoff where they had guns and the bad men didn't and the situation could only have been improved by the bad men being knocked out), I remain utterly unbothered that there is only one more episode before cancellation.

Comments

[kingandy]

Something that recurs in Cornell's Who work is his notion that anything that is of the TARDIS retains a connection to it; in No Future the Doctor escapes imprisonment by way of origami (he happens to have with him some stationery from the desk of his opponent, which happens to be his opponent's TARDIS - the paper was created as part of its disguise, so the Doctor is able to reshape that TARDIS fragment into a back door), and then in Scream of the Shalka he does something similar using his own mobile phone. The TARDIS key likely retains a similar link.

It may be reasoned that, since losing contact with its plasmic shell during the initial spacio-temporal disruption, the TARDIS had been struggling for a foothold in (for want of a better word) physical space. Presumably the craft could use its physical elements (the key and police box shell) as a beacon to orient itself, but was having trouble getting a good "fix"^[1] - some power input was required to boost the key's signal. So the battery was never powering the TARDIS itself, only the homing signal.

Admittedly much of this is speculation.

As an aside, the Doctor made some mention of "charging" the battery; quite how you'd do that with a sonic screwdriver I don't know, though I suppose "sonic" has always been something of an oversimplification for the benefit of the stupid apes.

[1] The thought occurs that the distance between the police box and key may have muddied the issue, creating two separate signals that the TARDIS may have had trouble differentiating in the turbulence.

[ed-fortune.livejournal.com]

Tardis is linked to the Gallifreyans and those who travel in it. The plot of Two Doctors basically hinges on this, and it's the edge the timelords have over other time travelling races. Their work is patented to the very essence of their beings.

Also, the roar of the winged-beastie and the TARDIS are disturbingly similar, no?

[kingandy]

Yes, at one point I thought I heard a materialisation when it was actually just another beastie coming in for attack.

[ed-fortune.livejournal.com]

You see, my No-prize skills tell me that it's the same sound because that's the sound of something tearing through space/time.

Paradox wise, I can suspend my disbelieve. I don't know how space/time physics work, if you have a time machine. I don't know the actual temporal mechanics of the TARDIS, nor does anyone. For all I know, time/space has set patterns it wants to go into, and settles at these points when it can.

[kingandy]

I kept telling myself here that in the Who universe there is a thing called Biodata which may or may not be "the biological link between a living organism and the Time Vortex, which maps out an individual’s effect on history", so tampering with events may have extreme consequences (and temporally duplicating yourself, as the Doctor and Rose did at the start, could easily exacerbate things by tangling the biodata or something).

So yeah, basically, good story, don't think about the mechanics.