Yes, that's exactly why it happens. I just found it amusing that there would be so many.
I personally find it more likely (at least in this case) that it's a bandwidth decision on Amazon's part - why send out millions of images when you can just as easily send a url? I can see, however, that more underhanded people may be interested in watching their messages travel around the world. I can't see whyyou'd be interested, but I can see that they would.
no subject
no subject
no subject
You can turn off HTML email on your amazon preferences.
I shall withold my rant about why HTML email was the worst invention 'eva for latter.
no subject
I personally find it more likely (at least in this case) that it's a bandwidth decision on Amazon's part - why send out millions of images when you can just as easily send a url? I can see, however, that more underhanded people may be interested in watching their messages travel around the world. I can't see whyyou'd be interested, but I can see that they would.
Why I care
Re: Why I care
Though I didn't think spambots cared whether an email address was valid or not ... surely they just ignore bounces?
Re: Why I care
no subject
Nah, as someone who has been known to read his email via TELNETting to the mail server, find any MIME encoded email (Including HTML) highly annoying.